David Augsburger is an Anabaptist minister and author teaching at Fuller Seminary. He’s written on such subjects as confrontation, violence and prejudice, about forgiveness and biblical counseling. But my favorite book of his is Dissident Discipleship; about how to follow Jesus in community – it can’t be done alone, he says, and it should be done with some humor.
In community prickly truths are sometimes spoken, values need reconciling, pride needs puncturing, authority needs questioning, convention needs revision, legalism needs unlacing, licentiousness needs fencing. We need the right tools for such important jobs.
One such tool is humor. Some excerpts from the professor on the serious subject of lightheartedness:
Humor steps back from seriousness to see the lighter side; it holds events at arm’s length to see their irony. It is a perspective on life that allows us to discover, express, and appreciate the ludicrous, the absurd, the incongruous elements in ideas, situations and happenings.
[Humor] exposes the gap – or gulf – between the ideal and the actual, between intention and achievement.
Laughing is our way to humility…the way to puncture pride without wounding personality…
According to Augsburger, humor comes in two flavors: dark and light.
Dark humor is what some might label “sarcasm.” Webster says sarcasm is bitter and caustic, intended to do harm or cause pain. If defined in that way, sarcasm sure is dark and dangerous stuff.
Dark humor is veiled or open aggression; it perpetuates prejudice; it denigrates persons or groups; it buttresses threatened hierarchies; it defends vaunted superiority; it is antihuman.
Light humor comes in all shapes and sizes – wit, satire, parody, caricature, etc. It never intends to do harm or cause pain to an individual but is a wrecking ball to those ideas, values, institutions and conventions being questioned or protested.
[Light humor] is sudden illumination with surprising insight. It is subtle deflation of whatever or whoever is inflated; it is the re-evaluation of those who have been devalued; it is shock when arrogance is humbled; it is relief when pretense is punctured; it is amusement when false claims are exposed.
[Light humor] does not yield to aggression, animosity, or the urge to annihilate. It smiles ruefully when reminded of its own fallibility; it chuckles in self-recognition before another’s inadequacies; it laughs aloud at the folly of the human situation. These three – the failings of self, the foibles of others, the foolishness of context and conventions – are all about humility.
Finally, I love this quote from Augsburger:
[Comedy] is essentially a protest, so rather than being dour and gloomy persons, Protestants should be first-rate comedians. Unfortunately, they have been known more for their gravity than their levity.
I sure hope I didn’t cross the line between wit and sarcasm, light and dark humor yesterday. I and my various sources of accountability (and there are many) didn’t think so since I caricatured an idea and not a person. But we could be wrong. Where do you draw that line between dark and light humor? Did I cross it?
Whether I did or didn’t, I think a lot of us Christians need to lighten up in general. We can think and love and laugh at the same time. I promise.
Molly says:
I don’t think you crossed the line in your post yesterday. I didn’t comment on it because I might have (crossed the line).
JessicaB says:
Another win.
Ally C says:
Shaun, as i said yesterday, i thought your post was hilarious. i will admit, i have a rather dark sense of humor, so perhaps i’m not the best person to ask. That said, i think your last paragraph was spot on– we do need to lighten up!
Kathy deuman says:
Another great post! This is a great follow up to yesterday. My husband is writing his master thesis on humor and the gospel. Interesting!
Michelle ~ Blogging from the Boonies says:
I don’t know if you crossed “the” line yesterday, but you crossed mine. I was food for thought though. It made me realize that we all have different stumbling blocks, different lines and different walks with Christ.
I still love and respect you, though. I’m excited to get to see you again in January, I am working the morning shift Compassion table at the Houghton College event.
Jeremy Keegan says:
Didn’t cross it. But now I need to go confess for calling sarcasm my love language.
Heather EV says:
I don’t think you crossed it at all. You attacked no one. The people who might have had a problem with it were the ones who held to the ideas you were making fun of. I think what you did fit this very well: “[Light humor] is sudden illumination with surprising insight. It is subtle deflation of whatever or whoever is inflated; it is the re-evaluation of those who have been devalued; it is shock when arrogance is humbled; it is relief when pretense is punctured; it is amusement when false claims are exposed.”
Tj says:
I don’t know if you crossed it or not. I am humor impaired.
Tater Mama says:
I took yesterday’s post as humorous, so I don’t think you crossed the line at all. And I agree that most people should lighten up a little. Keeping a (light) sense of humor about things can get us through some of the most difficult times in our lives.
Nicole @ Here's The Diehl says:
I didn’t think you crossed the line at all! Another great post today.
Angie Wilkinson says:
I felt you came across a bit ‘holier than thou’ or should I say ‘hipper than thou’.
Look how cool I am I can mock things that others find offensive.
And, as I said yesterday, I don’t hold those things you mentioned offensive so that is not the place where I am coming from.
That said, doesn’t mean I don’t appreciate you and what you were trying to say.
JessicaB says:
I just want to say, I really feel your sarcastic pain and totally understand your long time claims that not all people have been given the spiritual gift of interpreting sarcasm.
My husband and I both have very dry senses of humor and we have a long track record of accidentally offending or angering people because of it. Some people take us too literally, some people…just don’t understand what we’re saying at all.
So where that leaves the humor balance in blogging, I don’t know. You win some, you lose some.
Kevin V says:
Amen ! Good word man. And you deff did not cross it .. its good to be free
Erin says:
Didn’t cross any lines with me. I think we need to lighten up a bit. And I do believe God thinks it’s okay for us to LAUGH! And that is exactly what I did when reading your post yesterday.
Lindsay says:
I’m an incredibly sarcastic person. However, I’ve noticed that my sarcasm generally comes out when I’m trying to make light of a subject that I really don’t feel quite so lightly about. There are also times when I use sarcasm to poke fun at something that I feel is beneath me.
Another thought: You took two shots at the SBC (or at least things that are very, very closely tied to the SBC) in very close succession. Perhaps for those of us who grew up in the SBC (or are still a part of the SBC) and turned out to be pretty fine Christ-followers (if I do say so myself), it stung.
It is highly possible that some of your readers projected their own feelings and weaknesses onto your post. If I was one of those readers, I’m sorry.
Also: The danger with sarcastic posts that skirt so close to the caustic line is this – Commenters (Commentors?) always feel the freedom to take it one step further. Sometimes, when the author uses such a sharp sense of “humor”, the readers feel that permission has been granted to do the same. The following comments simply continue further down the trail.
You can’t be responsible for what other people say (or type.) But you can be responsible for the path you set them on. (I’m very guilty of this, as well.) As authors, we have an incredibly heavy burden to bear. We have quite a responsibility to lead our readers to set their minds upon things above.
When we’re trying to motivate them to think deeper…when we’re trying to challenge the status quo…that responsibility deepens.
Your accountability partners know you *much* better than the vast majority of your readers. They can immediately see the heart behind your words. Sometimes we, the readers, can’t.
It’s a tight, tight rope. I applaud you for trying to walk it. 🙂
Jason Rust says:
“Also: The danger with sarcastic posts that skirt so close to the caustic line is this – Commenters (Commentors?) always feel the freedom to take it one step further. Sometimes, when the author uses such a sharp sense of “humor”, the readers feel that permission has been granted to do the same. The following comments simply continue further down the trail.”
That was good
Angie says:
that was good! Gave me some food for thought for myself.
Thanks Heather!
Angie says:
sorry, Lindsay not Heather. . .
Jason Rust says:
I don’t think you crossed it, but it was close.
I think Al Mohler’s blog came across a tad legalistic, but I got his point. When I first read it, I thought, oh great…don’t we have better things to worry about? But then thinking deeper, I determined that I probably should be a little more careful. I personally think Mohler’s Yoga complaints would have worked better in a smaller audience. For instance, if a new Christian came to me and said, “i love yoga and i meditate and blah, blah, blah”, that would probably be a good time to focus in on yoga and the POSSIBLE problems with it.
Honestly, what saddens me are some of the comments on your blog. People that are Christians that are so ready to throw a brother in Christ (along with all Baptists) under the bus if given the opportunity. I guess maybe that is just a result of being burned in the past? Not sure, but either way we are supposed to love our brothers and gently correct them. The question about Yoga is, “how can I glorify God the most, with or without Yoga.” Pretty much the same with anything else.
I am sure anyone (you and Mohler) are in a tough position when put yourselves out there. It takes a thick backbone.
I believe Mohler is able to take it and find humor in it (hopefully). I follow Russell Moore on Twitter (who essentially reports to Mohler-Dean of the School of Theology). Here are some of his recent tweets:
Just confronted by an irritated Yoga enthusiast. I DIDN’T SAY IT! Gave her @albertmohler’s cell phone #.
Thrilled that @albertmohler finally came out against the spiritual dangers of opera. Wait. Yoga? Oh. Never mind.
Feeling my 39 years today. Joints are so arthritic I could barely get up off the Yoga mat this morning.
Know that is funny.
Shari Davenport says:
Hey Jason, i have been reading another Fuller author Lewis Smedes and I love him for many reasons, but one of them is that he desired to be a ‘bridge’ person vs a ‘gap’ person. Which means rather than fix a chasm between ourselves and unbelievers, or those who believe differently, why not build a bridge and learn from each other. Seems much more humble and graceful than the ‘throwing under the bus’ thing you mentioned and we see too often.
Kudos
Princess Leia says:
So this is a matter of discernment? ;p
I think humor is an excellent way for someone to save face personally (since you’re not attacking _them_, just an idea that they happen to hold), while at the same time walking away with something to think about.
I think the line is crossed when a personal attack is made, either in a humorous way or not. The problem comes in when people don’t separate their ideas from their person and see an attack on an idea that they hold as an attack on their person.
So again….an issue of discernment. You _intended_ no personal attack on Dr. Mohler, so you crossed no line. Other people read into what you said, included comments from others into their opinions, and/or took what you said personally because you were attacking an idea(l) that they hold…and therefore made it a personal attack when it was not intended as one. To them, you crossed a line.
There’s only so much you can do, and you’ll never be able to please everybody, so say what you’ve been called to say, always through a filter of love/compassion/mercy, and let God sort out the results.
jen says:
I don’t think you crossed it. As a matter of fact I appreciate what you had to say and how you said it. (But I sure do love the pic at the top of this post considering yesterday’s comments!)
“Whether I did or didn’t, I think a lot of us Christians need to lighten up in general. We can think and love and laugh at the same time. I promise.”
-I agree wholeheartedly.
Kristen Schiffman says:
You certainly didn’t cross it. If anything, like always, you created an invitation to dialogue.
I even sent yesterday’s post to non-blog readers. And I never do that!
CardsFan says:
So, I can see where sardonicism would fall in the aperture of humor, but I’m not sure I agree with sarcasm always needing a flash to lighten the effect. When the hearer has the gift of interpretation, sarcasm can bring smiles to the downcast.
Having said that, I took no offense to yesterday’s post. It was actually quite thought provoking.
John says:
I think the fact that whether you crossed a line with yesterday’s post even has to be a discussion is embarrassing. This kind of thing is what makes me avoid most “Christian websites” and it’s a great example of the type of behavior that makes most non-Christians I know want to keep their distance from us. It’s laughable stuff.
There are plenty of issues worth discussing. Whether people are accidentally worshipping Buddha by exercising is pretty obviously way down on the list. If it’s not, then most reasonable people are going to want out of the discussion group altogether.
Shari Davenport says:
I have wondered if we ought not to pay attention to our own sarcasm – even if we are able to suppress our thoughts and not say it our loud =] Could it be a window into our True feelings? Might it serve us to go with the Lord to that ugly place in us and ask Him to help and heal us so we are not simply biting our tongue??
Matt Church says:
Cross a line? I don’t think so…… My primary issue was that I felt there were some discrepancies in what was being presented and what was actually posted by Mohler. My attempt was mainly to point out where I felt his points clarified some of the things that were being painted inaccurately. The humor was not lost on me, it is a very narrow tight rope and you walk it way better than I ever could. However, it can very easily be interpreted as being snarky.
Anyway I will leave you with a quote from C. H. Spurgeon that has helped put thing in perspective for me from time to time.
Quick to Criticize
We shall, as we ripen in grace, have greater sweetness towards our fellow Christians. Bitter-spirited Christians may know a great deal, but they are immature. Those who are quick to censure may be very acute in judgment, but they are as yet very immature in heart. He who grows in grace remembers that he is but dust, and he therefore does not expect his fellow Christians to be anything more; he overlooks ten thousand of their faults, because he knows his God overlooks twenty thousand in his own case. He does not expect perfection in the creature, and, therefore, he is not disappointed when he does not find it. As he has sometimes to say of himself, ““This is my infirmity,”” so he often says of his brethren, ““This is their infirmity;”” and he does not judge them as he once did.
I know we who are young beginners in grace think ourselves qualified to reform the whole Christian church. We drag her before us, and condemn her straightway; but when our virtues become more mature, I trust we shall not be more tolerant of evil, but we shall be more tolerant of infirmity, more hopeful for the people of God, and certainly less arrogant in our criticisms.
From a sermon by Charles Haddon Spurgeon entitled “Ripe Fruit,” delivered August 14, 1870.
You are an incredible talent in so many ways. May God continue to bless you. I look forward to more stuff.
Texas Preacher Woman says:
Thanks, Matt, for the Spurgeon excerpt — just what I needed to read today!
Kris says:
I do not think you crossed the line. I thought it was funny. Thought provoking in my opinion.
I actually was laughing thinking about me doing yoga and how their is absolutely nothing “spiritual” (or graceful for that matter) about it. Just me trying to contort myself into the right pose, remember to breath correctly and relax all at the same time-quick before its onto the next pose.
r.winn says:
good follow up post, Shaun.
I’ve been munching on your questions all day. The problem with blogging sometimes is that those of us who don’t know you personally or very well ‘on-line,’ don’t know your sense/degree of humor. We must try to figure it out. And naturally, sometimes the reader gets it wrong.
I confess to being of a more serious nature, not that I don’t enjoy clean humor. This, I know, colors the lens through which I read yesterday. And having been often teased about numerous things, I also know that humor for one person can cause pain to another, even if unintended. So my heart for unity and sensitivity in the Body comes from an honest place. If I misunderstood your writing and caused pain, I am truly sorry.
I think Lindsay (above) expressed all I’ve tried to write much more clearly.
Blessings again, Brother,
rachel
Kim says:
I don’t think you crossed a line at all. I think most people are fine with sarcasm until the target of the sarcasm is something that is close to their heart, at which point it becomes offensive to them.
I think you have to take intention into account when you read or hear something sarcastic. I don’t feel your intention was to offend, but simply to show a different side of an issue and you chose to do so in a humorous way. Would it have gone over better if you had just seriously laid out what your thoughts were on the subject? Maybe, maybe not, but the intention would have been the same.
We all have to realize that there are theological interpretations that have been argued over through the centuries by theologians and laypeople. Never has there been 100% agreement on every debatable subject. So, who is right? Who is wrong? I say neither, because God meets us all where we are and teaches us in a way that is as unique as each of us are.
So, people are not going to agree with you all the time and will be quick to chastise you for your lack of discernment, tact or whatever. It is up to you to think about what they say and prayerfully consider whether their assessment has merit. If it does and it is change-worthy, then change it.
Sorry, didn’t mean to write a novel there. 🙂
Shaun Groves says:
Thanks for the education today, everybody. Thank you very much for making me better.
Sarah says:
I pondered a response to this a couple of times. Even tried typing one out, and it took over 2000 characters! Yikes! But here’s my thought in a nutshell: it seems that it was the subject matter, not the humor/sarcasm that was the bigger issue. Many people who took issue (and/or offense) at your post might’ve applauded sarcasm/satire if it was a different topic. Seems you really “hit a sore spot” so to speak when it comes to being in the world but not of it, and where that line should be drawn. I appreciated the satire, but I think I come closer to thinking like you do on this topic than some of the other commenters. I think we only tend to appreciate sarcasm & satire on subjects that we are like-minded on, if that makes sense.
Alexia says:
I really couldn’t have said it better myself, so I’ll just agree with Sarah! 🙂 I appreciate the sarcasm/humor – I don’t like reading dissertations LOL
FzxGkJssFrk says:
I second Matt Church’s post pretty much in its entirety. I would just add that I have no standing to judge anyone for the use of snark in a blog post. Or in a song, for that matter.
Tara says:
Sarcasm is hard to pull off in blogging. If I need or want to blow off steam I add a SAL (sarcasm alert level) (Orange – Moderate) (Red – HIGH!)
in order to put people at ease before they read my sarcastic thoughts. I didn’t think you crossed the line, but I am a known jerk.
Douglas says:
Disclaimer: As an engineer, many social cues go right over my head, but from an analytical POV:
Both starting and ending with a direct challenge to Albert Mohler, I saw this as a bit personal.
On the other hand, the entire body was impersonal, concept specific, and light-hearted.
Pointing to a respectful, thoughtful and more theologically serious article explaining your ideas further was quite helpful and lends credence to the idea that you meant no disrespect.
Taken with the recent blog post on LifeWay books (I think a Baptist bookstore), one might discern a skepticism and possible antagonism toward the current state of the Baptist Church as far as discernment goes, but nothing definite.
Speaking for myself, while it could have been softened by not referring to Dr. Mohler by name at the closing of the post and thus focusing more on the concept, I don’t think you crossed the line given the light-heartedness of the rest of the post. Of course, I’m not a Baptist and I agree with your idea, so maybe I’m prejudiced.
Also, I didn’t read many of the 100+ comments and assume you did this, but it’s probably worth mentioning. Posting on a controversial topic almost always means somebody will challenge your ideas. Remaining respectful and assuming the best of the “opposition’s” intentions is difficult, but essential to the audience maintaining a light-hearted and thus charitable reading of your original post. It’s probably harder to use sarcasm in direct conversation over the internet because it is so easily misunderstood.
In conclusion, I wish I had your writing skills when conveying humor. You do it 1000 times better than I ever will.
alice says:
A few points:
1. I’ve been following your blog for a few years now (commented maybe once or twice in the past) and have always found it to be insightful and well-written.
2. I also appreciate sarcasm and can be pretty sarcastic when I write as well.
3. I agree with the message of your post yesterday about discernment.
4. I did not take any of your comments in yesterday’s post personally. I have no qualms about yoga, and none of the things mentioned hit “close to home”.
That said, I personally think that you _did_ cross the line yesterday, good intentions or not (it’s like when a kid breaks a family heirloom and says, “well, I didn’t mean to!” Fact is, they still broke it.). Even if you had no intention of ridiculing any particular person, I think that the fact that you included a name (and especially, as someone else has already pointed out, the way that you used it at the end of your post) gives that impression (I mean, most of your readers, despite claiming that you did not cross any line, seemed to have gotten that impression, too, with the way they thought it was okay to continue on with the personal attacks). And while the humor in your posts normally have a cheery, boyish light-heartedness, I couldn’t help but feel that you sounded incredibly snarky in your post yesterday. I’m all for immature humor, but it didn’t sound like immature humor to me… Just, immature. And stuck up. I’m sorry, I’m sure you didn’t mean to come across that way, but it was still a huge turnoff.
Even though I didn’t appreciate your post yesterday, I still found it easily forgivable — until I read the comments. Not just the comments of your readers, but your own as well. It just made me feel that your pride was even bigger! Pretty much all of them just sounded defensive. And this follow up post makes it even MORE difficult for me to shake this judgment. To me, it just screams defensiveness and need for affirmation, rather than humility. Is this post really necessary?? Why couldn’t you simply accept some of the very good tips from those who told you how you’ve seemed to cross the line? Why dismiss wise counsel and assume that they need to “lighten up”?
Ugh, I’ve been a fan of your blog for a long time and I’m sad to say that I’m really disappointed with the way you’ve handled your latest two entries. Oh well. Hopefully better luck next time.
Melody says:
Wow, somebody needs a hug. Or a percocet.
Seriously, you’re saying that if a few people are offended when the majority thinks its funny, that Shaun crosses the line? Uh-uh. Would you not tell someone who thinks Harry Potter is Satanic to lighten up? I would.
I personally thought (as did most of the commenters) it was hilarious and light-hearted. And yes, if you were offended, you really should lighten up.
Shaun Groves says:
Alice, could you cite a particular comment of mine that struck you as prideful?
And I wrote this post not out of defensiveness but quite the opposite, truly. I expected people to defend Dr. Mohler’s logic but I did not expect to be criticized for critiquing his logic (not him) using humor. The use of humor was a no-no to several people.
So I wrote this post to explain why I think humor is helpful at times. And I wrote this post to ask critics of my humor where exactly the line is. It’s been helpful when specifics are given. It’s given me a lot to think about and will no doubt make me a better writer in the future.
alice says:
Melody, I don’t think Harry Potter is Satanic, but I certainly would NEVER tell someone who thought so to lighten up. Just because you would do that doesn’t automatically make it acceptable behavior. Since when is it okay to think that things are good or beneficial simply because you – or even “most people” – are comfortable with it? Is goodness to be determined by the masses?
I will readily admit that I’m not the most sensitive person in the world (and I’m sorry to Shaun if I seemed overly critical — it’s a personal struggle of mine), but I’ve written my comment out of my conviction that it never hurts anyone to write or speak with as much sensitivity as possible… especially if you’re a blogger who has the ability to garner a hundred comments with one shot. It’s like that Spiderman movie quote: “With great power comes great responsibility”. Shaun clearly has a lot of power in the blogging arena. I was simply disappointed that he wasn’t as sensitive as he could have been, especially because I’ve been blown away with his ability to write about much touchier subjects with impressive sensitivity in the past.
Shaun, no offense, but I don’t really want to bother with any more nitpicking. Let’s just say that I totally agreed with a previous comment that said “I felt you came across a bit ‘holier than thou’ or should I say ‘hipper than thou’. Look how cool I am I can mock things that others find offensive.” That was exactly the kind of vibe that I got.
I also don’t think that line-crossing is even the point. If Christians are called to separate themselves from the world, then should we really be sitting around here debating the nuances of dark vs. light humor? If we already agree that dark humor is not holy, why not spend our efforts trying to kill it completely and strive to be as light in our humor as possible? Rather than asking your readers if you’ve crossed the line or not, why not simply state that you’re aiming to distance yourself as far away as you can from that line?
I’m just really disappointed with these posts and the comments. I can’t believe that Christians would say things like, “I don’t think you crossed the line, but I have a dark sense of humor, so…” as if it’s not a big deal. I have a dark sense of humor myself, but I don’t think it’s a good thing at all! I think it is a stumbling block from the purity that God wants from me. And to anyone who may want to tell me to “lighten up” on that, I just want to say : while I believe that following Christ should be filled with joy and laughter, I don’t think it should be taken lightly. Consider Romans 12. “Offer your bodies as living sacrifices… Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world… Hate what is evil; cling to what is good… Never be lacking in zeal…” etc. There’s urgency in every sentence. Christians need to get serious if they expect to grow. And from what I can see here, there’s a LOT of room for growth.
misty says:
I don’t think you crossed the line…. just my opinion.
However, some say that I have a dark sense of humor. So….take my opinion for what it is worth. 🙂
JessicaB says:
I was thinking about this last night. And the truth is, you really are Hippier Than Thou. Thee. Me?
But I like it because it reminds me of this other guy that was Even more Hippier than You. He wore sandals, and kosher clothing, and, from all since pictured accounts, had luxurious long hippy hair. He preached free love, and helping the poor, and tried to convince others to sell their possessions because they didn’t matter.
However, his hippy ideas were not well received.
He was known to call people dull, or snakes, or blind, or dirty cups, or painted graves. He also had a knack for telling a parodied version of reality in story form so’s to get a point across when people from his own religion were off course about an issue. He threw in a joke or two.
But of course, people saw through his storying ways and knew He were really talking about them. I think he got a lot of negative comments on his blog.
Eventually, the people from his parodies went all homicidal on him. Kind of a violent ending for a harmless hippy, in my opinion.
So, don’t feel bad. It’s not just you. Just look at it as one step closer to……..martyrdom?
Shayne says:
Personally I was highly offended because there was between 150 to 200 comments on a post that was basically about some big hooha in the SBC preaching against the “evils” of yoga.
I don’t know what’s worse…the fact that the church is more interested swallowing camels and choking on gnats, or the fact that one man poking fun at one of the SBC’s “rock stars” caused such a commotion.
Shaun…dude…it’s your blog. I thought the post was funny. And hopefully you won’t be poking fun at one of my “rock stars” anytime soon…or I might hafta hurt ya.
Kelli says:
I’m always a day late in commenting. 🙂 I didn’t think you crossed a line yesterday, but that is not a hot button issue for me. I could see where some people may have felt differently. I think, however, that sometimes the best way to handle a sensitive issue is with humor. And yes, there’s a fine line between the light and dark. I think the commenter who said it best stated that you didn’t cross “the” line but you crossed her line. She was respectful of you while still disagreeing. I thought you addressed the issue of yoga extremely well. It is a fine gist, you have, of urging people to talk, debate and think about issues before making blanket statements like “Yoga is wrong.” You certainly got people thinking with your first post…and with the follow up!
Paul Beltis says:
Right on! Write on brother! Right-on! Write on!
Kris says:
I don’t think you crossed it. I think you provided us all with good food for thought in a fun way.
I think that often when people are critical it is because they are responding from their own woundedness. Their own hurts and struggles can be so fresh that they are overly sensitive and and tend to over-empathize with a perceived “victim.” Or, it could be that their own views or behaviors are challenged.
I think you are doing fine. Really.
Erica says:
I’m late joining, but I thought your post on discernment was awesome. The whole “slippery slope” argument is nonsense.