Ladies, help me understand something, please.
You know those magazines in the check-out line at Kroger? They almost always have a famous woman on the cover, and then some sensational headline out beside it? These magazines tell us important life-changing stuff about celebrities, like how bad they look in a swimsuit, how unhappy their marriage is, what their addictions are, how much their purse costs, who their husband is sleeping with, etc. I mean, the kind of information you just can’t live without.
And then there are the blogs dedicated to this same kind of tripe too: Tearing down successful female celebrities, and even successful female bloggers. There’s now an entire genre of printed and on-line materials, an entire industry, built around bringing down high-profile females.
And here’s the kicker. Who’s the audience for this stuff? Who’s shelling out billions annually to read bad things about women? Is it their Male Oppressors? Nope. It’s women. Women – some very much against the objectification of and discrimination against their kind – lap this stuff up. Lap. It. Up.
Help me – a man – understand this stupidity.
Those without Perez Hilton in their feed reader and People Magazine beside the toilet may cast the first stone.
tabitha says:
Thanks for pointing out our hypocrisy.
Grovesfan says:
By your qualifiers, I can cast. I personally can’t stand that kind of tripe, no matter who it’s written about. It’s gossip and it’s the worst kind, because 99% of the time, it’s not even close to being true.
Now, why do I think women read this stuff? Because our culture is so ingrained to think that in order to be “one of the beautiful people,” you have to be 5’8” to 5’10”, wear a size 2 (at the most), change your hair color/style at least as often as your underwear, and have enough money to make it seem “natural” to spend $2000 on a purse. Because we must do anything we can to build up the fragile self-esteem that this lie crushes on a daily basis, we devour anything that makes “the beautiful people” seem less than perfect, even “less” than we are ourselves. Since we are deceived into believing that our worth is man-based instead of God-based, being able to tear others down instead of building them up, makes us seem more worthy.
Personally, I have enough issues with self-esteem at times without worrying whether or not I’m as successful as Angelina Jolie or whoever.
OK, done ranting now. Back to your regular programming.
Cali Amy says:
I don’t know, it bugs me, too. I was especially disheartened by the treatment of Sarah Palin during the election. And no I didn’t vote her ticket.
angie says:
I guess I can cast away. ..
I think it’s because women tend to see themselves in a negative light, because they can never live up to the airbrushed pic of their fav celeb. We do it too ourselves (the comparising) our men do it to us ( NOT ALL and not mine, but you know A LOT DO!). So, if we can either think we can learn their ‘secret’ or that secretly they are fat, ugly, unhappy it somehow fills that void in us.
Seriously, the Sarah Palin thing was all the proof one might need to see that men and women are treated differently and that most women won’t do any thing about it.
Time to put down the rags and pick up a book! Time to stop focusing on our flaws and see as ourselves as Christ does–His beautiful bride! But, I’m afraid while we’re too caught up in that garbage we never will.
Shaun, as a daddy how do you think you can help your girls from falling into this trap?
Krista says:
Can’t really help you out… although I did read every issue of US one year when I was working and bored out of my mind. (it was the office copy).
Mostly it was just sad to see the super skinny girls and all the trauma in their lives. I wouldn’t want to live like that, always wondering who was going to take an unflattering picture of you. And goodness knows my marriage would be in way worse shape than it is if every rumor about me/us was spread all over the world!
I wish all those magazines would just go away. I read Reader’s Digest!
And did you know, Fred Meyer has a “family friendly” check out stand that doesn’t have any of those magazines in it. I LOVE it!
CrossView says:
I’ve been wondering about this, too. And the answer I’ve come up with is…
Nada.
Zilch.
Nothing.
It’s been that way for as long as I can remember. Growing up, I preferred the friendship of males since they weren’t backbiting, gossipy, and judgemental.
I think it shows more because of the anonymity of the internet.
But I do have a couple of lifelong women friends that are nothing like that. Which is why they ARE lifelong friends. ;o)
Michelle says:
I can’t help you understand it because I think it’s stupidity, as well. Maybe it’s because in tearing others down we feel better about ourselves. Isn’t that a great Christian attitude!?
Nancy Tyler says:
Maybe these would be better places to get those questions answered:
http://boards.eonline.com/Insider/Boards/index.jspa
http://blogs.accesshollywood.com/
Mystery says:
Maybe they’re not all to tear down but to expose deception. Would that make it better?
BTW you’ve been on [someone]’s blog a lot, and I’m sure you’re profiting in revenue and well as hits from her site.
Biting the hand that feeds you?
You didn’t have to go there, you choose to go there. It feeds your ego a little to have people speak of you.
[Shaun here: Mystery, my job with Compassion International is “blog relations,” which means, in part, that I’m the guy who says “thanks” when folks say good things about Compassion on the web and I’m the guy who answers questions when anyone in the blogosphere has them too. I show up all over the place to talk about Compassion because it’s my job. And I love my job. I do not profit from hits to my site monetarily. I don’t have paid advertisers. I also have a very well-fed ego, being a soft rock star and having pretty good hair and all ; ) – so I don’t look to blog traffic for that. I have enjoyed the great and difficult questions on the interwebs lately after our most recent trip to the DR. We had a lot of folks hear about Compassion for the first time ever because of this most recent trip and, as it should, that’s caused a lot of great discussion – not all of it positive. I had the same questions and criticisms for five years before finally deciding Compassion International was what they said they were. Keep the questions coming. I’m here to help if I can.]
Happy Geek says:
I do not read a lot of that stuff, I am not organized enough to have the time. But the running down of other women, you don’t have to read people to see that, you can find it at playgroup, soccer games, and bible study. It happens wherever women congregate. I’m as guilty as the next.
Why?
Makes us feel better I suppose. Covers our inadaquecies. Paul even addresses it in his letters. It is sin. However. it is easier to point out a sister’s sin than to deal with our own.
ConsciouslyFrugal says:
Some plausible causes:
1. Schadenfreude;
2. Internalized Oppression (the misogynist paradigm in which we live teaches women to view other females as competition and that all resources–love, money, joy–are scarce);
3. Externalizing Oppression (the Watts riots are a good example of this–when the burden of oppression is too great, the first attacks are usually directed at your own kind); or
3. Airing legitimate concerns regarding the actions and/or opinions of public figures.
On point #3, I would argue that it is important to value critical thought and to stop viewing judgment as a purely negative thing. Judgment is what keeps us from driving drunk and getting into cars with strangers.
Stone casting aside, candidates for political office should be heavily scrutinized. Don’t think that because a candidate has a vagina, those of us with vaginas will not question her record or qualifications.
Empowerment is not about behaving in a pre-ordained manner or giving other women a free pass (particularly if they are intent on harming you). It’s also not about celebrity worship (it’s ok to admire but not ok to criticize? Is that a genuine concern or more of an extension of the growing bias against critical thought, scholarship and all things “intellectual?”) or requiring that all segments of a particular population adhere to an external set of guidelines.
Short version: We’re not all the same, nor should we be required to behave, think, feel or respond in a certain way simply because we have vaginas.
I realize you’re talking about trash mags and general drivel, but I get very worried when we start telling people to stop thinking critically about issues or people or assuming that all segments of a marginalized population should behave in a particular fashion.
ShinyBonnie says:
I think maybe I can shed a little light on what makes the trash mags so popular… because reading about the spectacular crashes of snotty, psuedo-intellectual celebrity brats just feels so darn good! I love to hear that ol’ Britney Spears – who publicly open-mouth kissed Madonna (ugh! I think I just threw up a little in my mouth) is having a meltdown. Or that Brangelina aren’t (isn’t?) the happy couple they have every reason to be, despite their insuffrable international snobbery and telling me how I need to be a better “global citizen.” Or that Scientologist Tom Cruise’s fantasy about being lifted up by aliens is actually crashing down around him… Makes me feel good to see the results of their disastrous selfishness.
Katie says:
Count me as another woman who doesn’t know!
But perhaps is the same reason why men will spend hours pouring through motorcycle catalogs, looking at parts for bikes they’ll never be able to afford. Maybe it’s the same reason why I will find I’ve spent hours reading articles in Wikipedia, just because they’re interesting… when I should be doing more productive things with my day.
::shrugs::