It’s like transferring vinyl to mp3. A lot of information gets whittled away when the bible is taken from Greek and Hebrew and a foreign culture and ancient time and transferred into English to be read by modern Americans. What we’re left with is still beautiful and moving but we sense sometimes that what we read and understand today is lacking the fullness of the original.
That’s how I feel when I go to church and hear a pastor say something like “Now, brother So-and-so will lead us in worship” and I watch as brother So-and-so opens his hymnal or picks up his guitar and sings – asking the rest of us to join him. Or how about when I meet a musician who calls himself a “worship leader” or meet a pastor who says the “worship” at his church is fantastic, just something I’ve got to “hear.”
Sometimes the modern use of the word “worship” leaves me feeling hungry for something more – like the waiter’s delivered me a bowl of ranch dressing before the salad’s arrived. And other times I wonder if the chef has even heard of salad.
I was twenty-six when the word “worship” first left me feeling this way. I was standing at the back of our large church sanctuary watching more than a thousand people, many of them with hands raised, sing loudly to God. They were facing a stage and on that stage was a front man in ripped jeans and a t-shirt, one hand on his microphone and the other arm stretched up past his stubbled cheek and highlight-streaked haircut toward heaven. A thin haze of fog hung in the air around him, making the dances of colored beams of light visible. A row of singers clad in black flanked the front man, harmonizing beautifully together. A golden Les Paul pumping through a Marshall amp wailed from the darkness behind them where a thunderous bass pounced out and thumped us all in our bones. Keyboards and a massive drum kit filled in the rest of the stage and our ear drums. Behind it all, through the fog and laser lights and darkness, lyrics and moving images flowed continually across a twenty foot screen. This was everything I always wanted worship to be. It was every word we tossed around in planning meetings and at conferences: relevant, excellent, cutting-edge, moving.
I heard someone say once the best way to find out you’re wrong is for everyone else to think you’re right. And that’s what happened to me. For years we church staff people fought with the congregation and each other over what worship should look like and sound like. We lobbied hard for the front man and his t-shirt, the guitars and drums and bone thumping bass, the songs and singers and lights and big screen. And we emerged victorious. Those who disagreed with us left and those who stayed believed we were right – or didn’t care. Regardless, we got what we wanted and that left me with the suspicion that we were wrong, that there was something else, something more to “worship.”
But what else was there?
Over the next couple years I tried to find out. I looked up every mention of the word “worship” in the bible and then took a look at the original Greek and Hebrew words they were all translated from. This took a long time since I’m a musician by training, not a linguist, but it was worth it. What I discovered made me angry at first. What was missing was so obvious that I couldn’t believe I’d never heard it come from a pastor, a worship leader, never heard it at a conference or read it in a book.
I discovered that of the eleven Greek words and the five Hebrew words translated as “worship” in the bible, NONE of them have ANYTHING to do with music.
And suddenly what I thought was vinyl turned out to be an mp3.
Or a lie.
anne jackson says:
amazing.
something my husband (who “led worship” at our former church for a couple of years) and i have prayed about, sought after, discussed, and tried to understand (all while, of course, trying to keep cynicism to a minimum and a loving attitude).
since i work in communications at our church, i see it as an opportunity to replace “worship starts at 7 pm” to “services start at 7 pm” and the like. it’s my own little way of changing the culture in which we communicate. if we want people to truly understand (as best we can here on earth) the context and definitions of true worship, we have GOT TO stop putting an =music in how we communicate.
Noelle says:
I understand the frustration with what we call worship. For me I’ve had a hard time with scenes like what you’ve described. I think I’m finally just beginning to understand what worship truly is. I’ll definately have to look into the Greek and Hebrew.
Cynthia says:
Well put my friend! Thank you!
Anon says:
I agree. I think that worship is more an attitude of the heart and serving God whole-heartedly, but I haven’t looked up any of the definitions in Hebrew or Greek either. Would you share some of what the bible says about worship in the original context?
RBerman says:
Yup, Shawn. Somewhere along the line “worship music” (the musical portion of the corporate worship of God) got shortened to “worship,” leaving a generation of Christians confused about what “worship” is. And leaving them really confused when they read Romans 12 and find that submission to God is worship.
Chestertonian Rambler says:
Let me preface this by saying that I’m a freak in that my desire-to-do-good-works is rather excessively strong. (Not that I actually DO good works, mind you–just that if someone says something is morally a good idea, I immediately assume I should start feeling guilty that I haven’t done it/haven’t done it thoroughly enough.)
Anyway, just speaking of the portion of worship that is coming before God with a sense of awe and reverence–I’m trying to decide how Luther’s contention that communion is the time when God serves us (rather than us serving God) fits in.
That is, how much of worship is us serving God (through actions, obedience, submission, acknowledgment of his supremacy), and how much of worship is God serving us (“as we bask in his presence,” &c.)?
(Not that writing one post makes you an expert or anything…but I think it is certainly worth pondering.)
NH says:
You are right to say that worship has nothing to do with music, BUT the bible does say in Psalm 149 to “Sing to the Lord a new song, his praise in the assembly of the saints. Let them praise His name with dancing and make music to Him with the tambourine and harp. For the LORD takes delight in His people… “ and in Ps. 150 it says to “praise Him with the sounding of the trumpet, praise Him with the harp and lyre, praise Him with tambourine and dancing, praise Him with the strings and flute, praise Him with the clash of cymbals, praise Him with resounding cymbals. Let everything that has breath praise the LORD.”
God is the inventor of music and what better way to honor and bring Him Glory than to use His invention to praise Him.
Sometimes tho we should worship in the quiet times. Sometimes I believe God wants us to be still and quiet in His presence in order to hear His voice more clearly. Those moments are precious to both the saint and the Savior.
But, I believe when we sit at the feet of Jesus in heaven surrounded by the crystal sea and angels, sitting next to Paul and Peter we will praise Him with music and we will praise Him without it. And in both situations, He will be there in the midst of His people.
Shaun Groves says:
NH, you said: God is the inventor of music and what better way to honor and bring Him Glory than to use His invention to praise Him.
Oh, there are better ways, I think, but that’s a good one. Better would be the ways Jesus asked us to…and he never mentions music.
Praise is USUALLY a musical term in scripture. But I’m writing about the word “worship.” Maybe ext time I’ll write about “praise.” Hmmm.
Chestertonian Rambler (what a name), I’ll probably get chased out of town by the pitchfork toting Lutherans for this but, I’m not in a agreement with a lot of what Luther wrote and preached. This would be one of those things we don’t agree on if you’re summarizing his thoughts correctly and I’m understanding you correctly.
Chestertonian Rambler says:
Okay, thanks.
Although in deference to Lutherans, I must say I’m not so much summarizing as extending. (i.e. Luther said X about Communion; I’m asking if it could be applied to the concept of worship.)
kathryn says:
thank you for writing this series. I’m glad i check in tonight.
nh says:
Maybe there are “better” ways to worship Him than with music. I was just saying that it honors Him when we use what He has created to glorify and worship His name. And yes, there is a difference between praise and worship.
John 4:24 “God is Spirit and His worshipers must WORSHIP (pay homage, show reverence, kneel down, fall down)
in SPIRIT (spirit, heart, mind, the immaterial part of the inner person that can respond to God) and in
TRUTH ( truthfulness, truth, corresponding to reality.)”
I haven’t read all of your blogs pertaining to this subject, but do you address the way Jesus would have us worship? Honestly, I’m not sure it makes a differenc in the eyes of our LORD if we worship with music or not. I can pay my reverence, fall down, kneel at His feet with or without the music. As long as the attitude of my heart is that of worship.
PS The definitions came from Stongs concordance!
nh says:
I meant Strong’s Concordance
Jeff M. MIller says:
Shaun, thank you for your words during this series.
Sorry for the mix up and saying you’ve wrapped u this series on my post today. I assumed, and you know what happened then…
I’ve corrected the statement, and thanks for stopping by to set me straight.