Coulda Saved The World

Relevant Magazine apparently says…

“If Christians had given the traditional 10 percent tithe of their income to their churches in 2004, instead of the 2.56 percent that they actually gave, there would have been an additional $164 billion available, according to a report released in October called “The State of Church Giving through 2004.” If the churches chose to funnel just $70-$80 billion of that additional income to missions and humanitarian works, the basic needs of every person on the globe would be provided.”

I don’t have a Relevant subscription.  They actually refuse to deliver it to a house where a mini-van lives.  So I haven’t read the article this was excerpted from.  Can someone tell me where and how “The State of Church Giving through 2004” got its numbers?

  • How did someone determine what all Christians worldwide (or are these figures just for American Christians) gave in any year?  Who collected that info from all denominations and non-denominations and non-non-denominations (house churches, for instance)?
  • How did anyone determine the total income of Christians worldwide (or just American Christians) in order to figure out what their total “tithe” should have been?
  • How does one define “basic needs” and then how does one put a price tag on total basic needs of the entire world, closed countries, bush country, remote people groups?
  • How was “provided” defined?  Provided for one day?  For a year?  Is this taking into account overhauling complete governmental systems of entire nations, the cost of obliterating the caste system of India and the providing a business model for the coffee companies of El Salvador and the mafia-like slave traders in the Philippines – all of which wield the power to perpetuate poverty in their regions?
  • I’m not poo-pooing this study or its idealism.  I’m an idealist.  Jesus was an idealist.  I’m seriously wondering how this research was done – because, if accurate, it was truly a remarkable endeavor to get such information from every corner of the globe and I’d love to know how they did it.  And I’m curious about how this paragraph was used by Relevant Magazine.  What was the context?  Was this study quoted to convince us that meeting a physical need through our giving will end neediness permanently or was it quoted to point out our collective power and inspire us to wield it?

    Regardless, very interesting numbers.  I hope they’re true.  I’d like to learn more.  Got info?