Todd Risley and Betty Hart studied children living in Kansas City for three years: the first three years of the kids’ lives. They wanted to know what made those three years different for children on welfare versus children whose parents were “professionals.” And, most importantly, which differences made the greatest impact on the development of those children.
The biggest and most impacting difference was not income, nutrition, quality of education – though those were certainly different. The biggest most important difference was language.
Children who grew up in “professional” homes heard 20,000,000 more words in the first three years of their lives than kids on welfare. The more words a child hears, the researchers say, the better developed the child is – from self-control and self-confidence to problem solving and reading and writing.
Not only was the quantity of words disproportionate but the quality as well. Children of professionals heard 500,000 encouragements and 80,000 discouragements in the first three years of life while children on welfare heard the opposite: 80,000 encouragements and 200,000 discouragements.
James Heckman, a Nobel Laureate economist has spent much of his adult life studying various programs aimed at benefiting those at the bottom of the economic ladder in America. He’s discovered that most programs do not work, they do not end poverty: welfare to job training, they treat poverty and joblessness as a situation in which a small set of adults skills is lacking, he says. These programs ignore child development and act as if, once an adult, deficiencies created in childhood can be repaired. They likely cannot.
By six a child has a basic understanding of right and wrong and the consequences for each. By six a child can get himself out of bed and begin a task on his own. By six a child can find middle ground with an adversary on the playground or decide to walk away from him in peace if he can’t. By six a child can choose delayed gratification over an immediate reward. He understands hierarchies and his place in them. He can look an adult in the eyes, steer a conversation his way, reason, persuade and disagree respectfully. He can predict outcomes based upon what’s already been observed. But if at six he can’t do these things, the experts say it’s probably too late for him to learn. His path in many ways is set.
And words are the biggest part of this training. 500,000 words of encouragement in only three years. That’s 456 words of encouragement every day.
I don’t know about you, but I’m suddenly motivated to write my sponsored children today and make sure I lavish 456 good words on my own.
Noelle says:
Thanks for the reminder to write my child.
Grovesfan says:
I hadn’t read these statistic before, but they do make sense. I assume that most parents think they’re kids are pretty special and also very cute. I know I do (well, the teenagers get less “cute”, but you get my drift). Anyway, in one of my first letters to our little boy Wedner (he lives in Haiti), I told him how handsome I thought he was. I honestly wasn’t trying to pass on empty flattery, etc. I do think he’s very handsome. When I received his reply, he asked me if I really thought he was handsome and why I thought so. I got the impression he’d not heard that before. I gave him many reasons why in my next letter.
Now I am very mindful to tell all my children different encouraging things about them every time I write. I’ve noticed a change in their letters as well. They seem to open up more and they want to find out more about us too.
I love all my “babies” and try to tell them so often.
Judith Tremblay says:
I have heard this before, and I have some sad observations to add. A kindergarten teacher shared that one of her students would come to school ready to start a fight. Once he threw a girl down on the ground and stood over her, ready to hit her. He’s been taught by observation that it’s okay for a man to hit a woman–he’s imitating both his father and his grandfather. This is a five-year-old. It would be difficult to retrain him, even at this young age.
euphrony says:
Very true. I don’t know that I had ever seen such statistics explicitly, but the results have been taken as common knowledge for years by many.
And it reminds me that my daughter and I were supposed to write our sponsored child this past weekend. Maybe tonight we’ll have a little time.
Oh, and did you get my e-mail from a couple of days ago? It’s about Inspired to Action.
Shaun Groves says:
Just now catching up on e-mail, Euphrony. I’ll get to it soon, I promise. Thanks for your patience.
euphrony says:
Thanks, Shaun. I know how you bib-time soft rock stars have inboxes that require supercomputers to keep up with.
Liza Peterson says:
I found this interesting as someone who wants to go into counseling and My thoughts then ran back to the discussion I had on Sat in my groups Therapy Grad Class on Reality therapy, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality_therapy
If I think in terms of a client coming to me with a problem, say a drug addict and I help them get clean and send them on their way but don’t ask questions that may lead to a HUGE piece of the puzzle, say abuse then their coping skills will prob lead them back into their addiction…may end up showing its self in a different way but it’ll be there.
If you ask me the evidence Shaun has given us means all the more why a counselor MUST get to the bottom of it all by asking questions about the client’s childhood! I will in no way say I’m opposed to reality therapy, in fact maybe 2/3 of this theory I agree but I can not in any way keep my mouth shut and let someone go out only to be back in my, or someone else’s, office with the same problem, only manifested in a different way.